In Reply to: Well, see, I didn't find "Fear and Trembling" in the least, "silly." In the seventies, posted by tinear on October 18, 2010 at 07:31:17:
Between the two I thought Ramen was a watchable ***film***, the other one was a chore. I simply didn't care to see what happened next and how.
Could have been just me, but my wife didn't object to turning it off either.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I thought it was just a bad, boring film. - Victor Khomenko 08:06:18 10/18/10 (9)
- I thought you'd like the Hepburn-like waif.... nt - tinear 08:37:28 10/18/10 (8)
- I really don't know how you can mention the two in the same sentence... - Victor Khomenko 11:47:46 10/18/10 (7)
- No one would equate Hepburn's acting ability with Testud's, either. Audrey was.... pretty. - tinear 10:58:28 10/19/10 (6)
- "But vacuous." Because she didn't sleep with Kennedy? - Victor Khomenko 11:25:55 10/19/10 (5)
- She didn't? How quaint! nt - tinear 17:56:41 10/19/10 (4)
- I know... trully boring... no "Happy Birthday" song... - Victor Khomenko 05:46:02 10/20/10 (3)
- I found the nuanced performance in "Fear and Trembling" among the elite ones. nt - tinear 07:17:20 10/20/10 (2)
- Have you seen her in "Tomorrow We Move"? - Victor Khomenko 10:08:50 10/20/10 (1)
- No. Yes. nt - tinear 14:31:57 10/20/10 (0)