In Reply to: Nomination for the most disgusting GORE movie: Aftermath posted by Victor Khomenko on August 8, 2011 at 07:50:07:
You guys don't be such wussies. This was a morgue, forensic setting. It's easy to look at it from a student perspective. I was waiting for an eye to blink or a finger to twitch: that would have been scary.
The real question is WHY was this film made? To show off the latest in makeup effects? To make you think about your love ones who might end up in autopsy? To show how utterly depraved necrophilia is?
After feeding the dog the doctor ended up in his favorite chair and the camera zoomed in on the newspaper's death announcement of the girl he had just been 'intimate' with. This leads me to think the purpose of this exercise was to make one think of his loved ones who may be autopsied.
High rating? Don't get it. I guess I've seen too many Korean films to really get grossed over some spilled guts, liver, heart, and brains.
PS. Unless that was b&w film there will be questions at the Fotomat.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Didn't enjoy it but had no problem watching out of 'morbid curiosity' . . . - mr grits 22:34:13 08/08/11 (0)