This turkey got a "0" rating from Rotten Tomatoes critics. I give it the same thing an Underworld movie would get which is pretty dog-gone low. In UW you mostly got to slobber over Beckensale. Here you get to recoil over Aaron Eckhart with a lot of scars. This is actually a bit better than a UW movie and we still have Nighy being his slimy best. Good CGI and action, pathetic, worn-out story. Heaven forbid a sequel so keep your fingers crossed the Eckhart keeps getting other jobs.
Should you go? Probably not unless you love UW and all that supernatural crap done poorly. This is angels and demons meet Frankenstein. Sounds like a Three Stooges flick, eh?
It's time you guys chipped in and got me a truss.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - 'I, Frankenstein': Can you say Underworld? - Billy Wonka 14:24:47 01/25/14 (6)
- Saw the previews... - mkuller 11:13:28 01/26/14 (0)
- Are things seriously that bad in MS? nt - tinear 07:25:09 01/26/14 (2)
- I beleive you could do a better job of managing your jealousy. *. - Billy Wonka 10:46:33 01/26/14 (1)
- "Mississippi: the cloaca of a great river!" - tinear 18:17:08 01/27/14 (0)
- Again you take 1 for the team. I figured this was a stinker when it wasn't submitted for pre opening reviews^ - Road Warrior 15:05:52 01/25/14 (1)
- As Mel Brooks would say: "Stinks on ice" . . . - Billy Wonka 16:21:39 01/25/14 (0)