Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Will film hobbyists ever go retro-analog? - Billy Wonka 19:23:01 04/20/14 (13)

• Why this shy? - Victor Khomenko 06:48:15 04/21/14 (0)
• "Any solid ideas on how to get this rolling?" - volunteer 06:22:22 04/21/14 (11)
• Snob appeal....that's what sells. * - Billy Wonka 07:23:04 04/21/14 (10)
• True that, but to get your idea rolling... - musetap 12:49:27 04/21/14 (2)
• The 8 mm porn of the 70's.....those were the days...... - Billy Wonka 15:05:12 04/21/14 (1)
• Heard this at work as I was walking past some fellow... - musetap 20:22:58 04/21/14 (0)
• I'm all for it. - volunteer 08:34:26 04/21/14 (0)
• My film is wider than yours! - Victor Khomenko 07:26:48 04/21/14 (5)
• 135mm! Paul Allen built himself a cinema in Seattle just to show 3 films. nt - tinear 07:38:05 04/21/14 (4)
• "135mm! " In diameter? - Victor Khomenko 07:53:36 04/21/14 (3)
• Sorry, a quick bit of research showed it as 65mm: - tinear 08:50:40 04/22/14 (0)
• I carry a 155 smooth bore. * - Billy Wonka 08:43:13 04/21/14 (1)
• The bore part, I believe. - tinear 20:16:47 04/22/14 (0)

Follow Ups

• Snob appeal....that's what sells. * - Billy Wonka 07:23:04 04/21/14 (10)
• True that, but to get your idea rolling... - musetap 12:49:27 04/21/14 (2)
• The 8 mm porn of the 70's.....those were the days...... - Billy Wonka 15:05:12 04/21/14 (1)
• Heard this at work as I was walking past some fellow... - musetap 20:22:58 04/21/14 (0)
• I'm all for it. - volunteer 08:34:26 04/21/14 (0)
• My film is wider than yours! - Victor Khomenko 07:26:48 04/21/14 (5)
• 135mm! Paul Allen built himself a cinema in Seattle just to show 3 films. nt - tinear 07:38:05 04/21/14 (4)
• "135mm! " In diameter? - Victor Khomenko 07:53:36 04/21/14 (3)
• Sorry, a quick bit of research showed it as 65mm: - tinear 08:50:40 04/22/14 (0)
• I carry a 155 smooth bore. * - Billy Wonka 08:43:13 04/21/14 (1)
• The bore part, I believe. - tinear 20:16:47 04/22/14 (0)