In Reply to: RE: you are right... (Spoiler alert) posted by user510 on November 10, 2014 at 18:41:20:
would have no more success than those from the New World had in being populated by those from Europe.
And would not intelligence sufficient to create all that technology be able to do something as simple as contract what Buckminster Fuller designed decades ago, i.e. a huge canopy covering massive metro areas and protected, artificial agricultural areas?
I suppose some guys spent weeks thinking about "Inception," another overwrought effort: why bother? It's not "Hamlet." Making a narrative purposefully complex, when it doesn't have that much to say even when deconstructed, is a sign of weakness.
The Nolan "Batman" films worked--- they were straightforward enough. So did "Memento," largely because of the brilliant acting of Guy Pearce.
An over-reliance on "Wow!" dooms "Interstellar." It tries to pound the audience into submission.
Edits: 11/10/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A species unable to solve its problems on earth and then going off to settle another - tinear 19:36:12 11/10/14 (1)
- RE: A species unable to solve its problems on earth and then going off to settle another - Jazz Inmate 00:30:49 11/11/14 (0)