In Reply to: OK, I know I'm late to the party, but I finally saw "Interstellar". posted by free.ranger on November 17, 2014 at 20:44:14:
of Dave doing so in 2001. NO comparison. One is ultra-realistic, the other looks faked.
The light show sequence in 2001 similarly was superior. As were the scenes of space, the ships, etc. You cannot beat real items w/today's special effects. Kubrick and his cinematographer were geniuses. Nolan and his? Just Star Trek schlock peddlers.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Interstellar" FX: disappointing. Compare Damon trying to enter the spacecraft with the scene - tinear 19:50:39 11/19/14 (5)
- LMAO...2001 is dated, shallow, slow and dull. Doesn't stand the test of time NT - Jazz Inmate 14:09:10 11/26/14 (1)
- 2001 is Hilarious, because it is SOOH dated - jedrider 18:57:14 12/09/14 (0)
- Your 100s of negative posts about Interstellar... - mkuller 18:56:39 11/20/14 (2)
- Your insight is wrong, but I have become a bore. The Walnut Creek sage is right. nt - tinear 07:25:56 11/21/14 (1)
- RE: Your insight is wrong, but I have become a bore. The Walnut Creek sage is right. nt - mkuller 08:26:56 11/21/14 (0)