In Reply to: Intestellar, not so stellar posted by geoffkait on September 7, 2015 at 07:08:32:
...actually I liked it but you need to see it on the big screen to really appreciate the effects.
Similar to having to see Gravity in 3D to appreciate it.
Neil deGrasse Tyson says the science is pretty accurate.
But then I'm a sucker for time travel movies anyway and I don't mind McConaughey.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Intestellar, not so stellar - mkuller 09:07:54 09/07/15 (12)
- MK, you know well all science was written in Aramaic and the rest is fiction. * - Billy Wonka 15:11:26 09/08/15 (0)
- RE: Intestellar, not so stellar - geoffkait 10:34:16 09/07/15 (7)
- Considering the aging differential, I thought it was all in the right directions. - free.ranger 14:32:10 09/07/15 (5)
- RE: Considering the aging differential, I thought it was all in the right directions. - geoffkait 16:33:24 09/07/15 (4)
- Absolutely wrong. - free.ranger 17:10:14 09/07/15 (3)
- RE: Absolutely wrong. - geoffkait 17:19:04 09/07/15 (2)
- Alright, dude. Your point taken. - free.ranger 17:26:13 09/07/15 (1)
- RE: Alright, dude. Your point taken. - geoffkait 17:53:07 09/07/15 (0)
- RE: Intestellar, not so stellar - mkuller 12:50:46 09/07/15 (0)
- RE: Intestellar, not so stellar - Bill the K 09:28:00 09/07/15 (2)
- RE: Intestellar, not so stellar - mkuller 09:38:09 09/07/15 (1)
- Oscar for playing a hillbilly, he became Ron Woodroof easier than an astronaut. - PhilJ 09:52:59 09/07/15 (0)