Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - BladeRunner 2049 - user510 13:27:20 01/01/18 (19)

• It's wonderful; more believable than the first, more sophisticated and intelligent... - musetap 18:40:26 01/21/18 (0)
• RE: BladeRunner 2049 - Buck 09:22:06 01/15/18 (0)
• RE: BladeRunner 2049 - Wojciech 09:24:57 01/11/18 (0)
• Start collecting wood instead of bitcoin - Jon L 16:05:39 01/02/18 (1)
• Hey - wait a minute! I remember seeing a program with John Stossel. . . - Chris from Lafayette 12:53:05 01/03/18 (0)
• Meh, mostly art direction not beauty . . . - Billy Wonka 14:06:19 01/02/18 (1)
• RE: is that a tear... - user510 14:15:42 01/02/18 (0)
• An excellent but dour film. Not for those off of their antidepressants. - free.ranger 07:28:12 01/02/18 (1)
• RE: An excellent but dour film. Yes.. - user510 13:14:53 01/02/18 (0)
• RE: BladeRunner 2049 - bullethead 17:33:41 01/01/18 (0)
• Cinematography by Roger Deakins. Need I say more? Nt - geoffkait 16:39:40 01/01/18 (4)
• Unlike the original movie, some of the scenes were in daylight.... - user510 17:22:16 01/01/18 (0)
• There was only one tree in the entire movie... - Steve O 17:06:28 01/01/18 (2)
• It must've been after I walked out. Nt - geoffkait 17:37:15 01/01/18 (1)
• LOL...You musta walked out during the previews...or you didn't get around to walking in (nt) - Steve O 18:44:23 01/01/18 (0)
• I thought it was... - mkuller 14:25:55 01/01/18 (0)
• "may not be possible to always differentiate between what is and what isn't CGI"... - Steve O 13:51:01 01/01/18 (2)
• RE: "may not be possible to always differentiate between what is and what isn't CGI"... - user510 14:17:36 01/01/18 (1)
• Agree, the technical stuff was well done... - Steve O 17:25:32 01/01/18 (0)

Follow Ups

• I thought it was... - mkuller 14:25:55 01/01/18 (0)