In Reply to: Re: When is 16:9 not 16:9 ? posted by Hornlover on October 15, 2002 at 08:16:46:
Actually I wanted to buy a 16:9 screen since most of what I watch is DVD content. But even with that most of my DVDs are 2.35:1 not 1.85:1. So i'd still have letter boxing, as you observed even with a 16:9 set. So ideally I'dd really need a set capabile of at least 2.35:1 native. So I just settled on a big 4:3 set (36inch) rather than a more expensive 16:9 set (16:9). The image size in comparable on either.Also I think some movies are shot in even 2.76:1 (or is that 2.8something?) like Superman II and Ben Hur. That would yield some extreme letterboxing.
So yeah, I think even a 16:9 set isn't really enough.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yep, check those aspect ratios. - Aroc 09:05:49 10/15/02 (2)
- But it's the best we got. - Harmonia 09:39:51 10/15/02 (1)
- or you could just turn off the lights ... - Aroc 18:23:19 10/15/02 (0)