In Reply to: 30" Wide Screen vs 32" 4:3 ? posted by kyzyltuva on October 25, 2002 at 13:20:37:
I recently did a lot of HDTV shopping. Your estimates on the 30" 4:3 image size are close.Unless your room is small, I think the 30" sets are undersized for 4:3 programming. If you watch mainly cable TV, then a 32" would make sense.
But have you considered a 34" set? That's what I bought and it displays a good sized standard 4:3 image and a great 16:9 DVD or HD one. Bars on the sides don't bother me - a 2:35.1 image on a 32" 4:3 screen with massive bars top and bottom...now THAT bothers me.
It just depends on what you want to optimize your viewing for - we have digital cable, but we mainly watch movies off it, and we watch a lot of DVDs. Therefor, it was more important to us to go for the best 16:9 experience, which is definitlely going to be had on a widescreen TV.
I'm not a big fan of stretch modes. As I said, the bars with 4:3 don't trouble me overmuch. But as far as burn=in on either aspect ratio, unless you/re running your set in showroom "torch mode", with the contrast and the brightness cranked all the way up, you shouldn't have any burn-in issues with a CRT direct view.
You might want to check out www.avsforum.com and their direct view forum. Lots of good TV info there, including Samsung comparisons.
(Have you checked out the Zeniths?)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 30" Wide Screen vs 32" 4:3 ? - Harmonia 23:22:06 10/25/02 (0)