In Reply to: Re: Best DVD Players; the results are in. posted by R. Hertz on January 15, 2003 at 19:49:52:
Roger the price/performance. You gotta watch out a little with their tests, though. They are only after the creme de la creme of progressive video performance, don't test interlaced performance, and the flaws they find to be egregious, most of us probably wouldn't even notice. Also true, they don't care at all about audio performance. I have owned two of the top machines on their list, the Camelot and the new champ, the RP82. Both have flawless video performance. The Camelot, as you might imagine, also had great 2 ch. performance. But I've heard better sound out of a sea shell than the RP82. It's horrible.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Best DVD Players; the results are in. - j_thunders 20:54:57 01/15/03 (4)
- Audio? - Joe Murphy Jr 21:09:37 01/15/03 (3)
- Re: Audio? - j_thunders 21:14:08 01/15/03 (2)
- U so silly! - Joe Murphy Jr 20:19:21 01/16/03 (0)
- Re: analog audio ... - Aroc 15:06:51 01/16/03 (0)