Re: S-Video Vs. Component

Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

In Reply to: S-Video Vs. Component posted by ChicagoT5 on February 8, 2004 at 10:55:49:

Short answer is that Componet connection bests S-Video.
However, it does depend on the TV and source. If you have an older interlaced only TV that's not too big, then the difference is small.
If you have a source and TV capable of Progressive Scan or higher video qulaity standards (HDTV, 720P, 1080i etc.), then Component is the only way to go.
Few years ago I had a 40" interlaced widescreen Toshiba, one of the first with Component inputs. Because it wasn't huge and because it could only take an interlaced signal, was no big deal to use either.
Now I use a front projector and 8ft screen and watch 480P, 576P and HDTV (as well as regular TV) and the Component connection is the only way to go.
So Components better, but you need modern video gear to really appreciate the differnece. If your sets older, no need to bother.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Sonic Craft

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - S-Video Vs. Component - ChicagoT5 10:55:49 02/08/04 (5)

Re: S-Video Vs. Component - croft 19:38:25 02/10/04 (0)

Thanks For The Info - ChicagoT5 09:41:42 02/09/04 (1)

Re: Thanks For The Info - monk 23:40:53 02/09/04 (0)

Re: S-Video Vs. Component - monk 05:17:54 02/09/04 (0)

Component is better - John C. - Aussie 15:25:45 02/08/04 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: S-Video Vs. Component - monk 05:17:54 02/09/04 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.