In Reply to: LCD VS. Plasma posted by Jesse on October 4, 2004 at 18:21:51:
By LCD, I assume you aren't referring to rear-projection LCD.But from reading threads (note esp. www.avsforum.com threads), in general, LCDs are smaller than plasma. But the gap is decreasing. Samsung now has a 40" LCD (go see it at Best Buy). OTOH, plasma are as large as 63", and I think the smallest plasma is about 37" (maybe 32").
LCD struggle with having deep, dark blacks. Blacks aren't a problem for plasmas--in particular, Panasonic plasmas have very good blacks.
LCDs are lighter, consume less energy. Conversely, plasmas are heavier, consume more energy.
There is a lot of misinformation about plasma TVs. Yes, it is possible to get burn in, but not if you take basic precautions. Secondly, you probably won't burn out a plasma unless you watch it for 8 hours a day for 10 years. Nobody watches TV like that--unless, of course, they are unemployed, which means they can't afford either LCD or plasma . . .
If you read threads over at avsforum.com, you will see that many posters are plasma owners and quite satisfied.
regards, townsend
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: LCD VS. Plasma - townsend 17:46:11 10/05/04 (9)
- There are some fairly large LCD RPs. - Harmonia 02:09:30 10/06/04 (8)
- Bargain? I've got your bargain, right here! - Joe Murphy Jr 21:21:19 10/06/04 (7)
- Joe--how about the same specs but one size smaller? (nt) - townsend 07:08:13 10/07/04 (6)
- Smaller? I've got your smaller, right here! - Joe Murphy Jr 18:59:50 10/07/04 (5)
- Re: Smaller? I've got your smaller, right here! - townsend 13:25:15 10/08/04 (4)
- Hmmm... - Joe Murphy Jr 14:58:40 10/08/04 (3)
- Re: Hmmm... - townsend 21:58:37 10/08/04 (2)
- thoughts - Joe Murphy Jr 13:38:18 10/09/04 (1)
- Thanks for your expertise . . . much appreciated (nt) - townsend 07:08:13 10/10/04 (0)