|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
|
|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
In Reply to: If money is no object... posted by HiFiMaster on November 18, 2004 at 06:38:51:
The differential between seperate and integrated components depends on your needs, if cost becomes an object, that is.For instance, I've got a NAD power amp to drive my big magneplanar front channels, and I'm going to get a receiver to do surround processing and drive the surround channels. You just don't need that much power for the surrounds, especially if the fronts are taken care of.
Now, if you're REALLY talking cost-no-object...
Runco MBX-1 DLP projector. $120k
Snell & Wilcox Interpolator Gold video scaler/processor. $60k
Meridian 800 DVD player. $20k
California Audio Technology System XXX audio system. $8.7 MILLION
(Includes 35 speakers, 33 amplifiers and custom installation)Call it an even $10,000,000 for a medium-sized custom-installed luxury theater that will rival, if not best, the Skywalker ranch setup :)
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Seperate/Integrated performance - jbmcb 07:28:40 11/18/04 (7)
- Re: Disagree - rico 11:52:59 11/18/04 (6)
- Re: Disagree - jbmcb 12:13:26 11/18/04 (5)
- OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. - Harmonia 19:32:21 11/18/04 (4)
- Re: OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. - Estes 06:22:34 11/19/04 (3)
- Re: OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. - jbmcb 09:04:00 11/19/04 (2)
- Re: OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. - rstroman 07:45:15 11/20/04 (1)
- Re: OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. - DsrtJeeper 21:31:31 11/24/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
