In Reply to: Who cares about HDMI? posted by racerguy on February 25, 2006 at 08:41:34:
While I agree that most people use component connections for HD, I think if you asked most people they would prefer to run just one cable to their display rather than three separate cables. By the way, HDCP-compliant displays (starting with DVI-HDCP, then later HDMI) have been around for at least 3 years -- not just 6 - 8 months ago.As for delivering full resolution, many older displays can't handle it via their analog component connections -- even if the full resolution were delivered. And by "handle it", I mean more than just "accepting it". The analog component connections on displays purchased when HD displays first came out (and even a few years ago) were made with parts that weren't designed to actually handle all of that bandwidth (I'm not even talking about 1920x1080p here, but even less demanding 1920x1080i). They can't resolve all of the detail. Sorry, but that's the sad truth.
Not all studios will use ICT (Image Constraint Token) aka "the analog flag". Those that do will be required to label the outside of the package and actually tell you they'll be limiting the analog output resolution. If you don't have an HDCP-compliant display or don't want to get one of the HDCP work-arounds (little black boxes), don't buy movies from those studios. But don't stop there! I would further recommend that you make sure you send a complaint letter to that studio every time they release a movie you want with embedded ICT and also be sure to voice your opinion in every video forum re: ICT while referencing the studio that put out that movie. Furthermore, send complaint letters to all of the places of business where you purchase your movie software. Let them know that they are losing potential sales due to what certain software suppliers (the offending studios) are doing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- HDMI - Joe Murphy Jr 09:33:44 02/25/06 (5)
- Re: HDMI - racerguy 17:18:01 02/25/06 (4)
- Funny: - unclestu52 23:30:47 02/26/06 (3)
- Re: Funny: - pkell44 17:26:55 03/12/06 (0)
- You have completely missed the point (nt) - racerguy 08:41:09 02/27/06 (0)
- Re: Funny: - Jack G 05:14:02 02/27/06 (0)