Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange?

Posted by David Aiken (A) on March 20, 2007 at 23:17:52

In Reply to: Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? posted by jeromelang on March 20, 2007 at 00:28:20:

Well, it's a bit much to expect everyone to check the archives every time before writing a reply. Usually we all, probably including you, simply respond to posts on the basis of what's contained in them and how we read them. That's what I did here and I got something wrong.

I'm sorry about the mistake but I can't be bothered querying the archives every time before I make a post. If I did I wouldn't make any posts whatsoever nor would most other people. We really don't have the time to read the current posts, then search the archives for everything a poster may have posted recently that is relevant. An inmate search indicates that you have made 1135 posts so how long would it take me to check them. An inmate search for me indicates 3058 posts but I've been posting here since just after the Asylum started up and I'd be prepared to bet that I've made more posts than that. How long did you spend searching the archives for stuff I've previously said that may be relevant to your response before you replied to me.

You've made a number of claims here and in your earlier post, and you haven't cited any evidence for them. Why should Sony buy a quantity of discs from Amazon to bundle with the PS3, especially when it happens to be a Sony disc? How plausible is that?

Conspiracy theories are all well and fine, but they really do have to be plausible. A lot of what you're saying here isn't plausible. That doesn't mean it can't be true but it does mean that your statements do require some back up evidence if you want people to take them seriously rather than simply regard them as mistaken.

David Aiken

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - James Bond rules, Blue ray is no 13 in UK - Ole Lund Christensen 01:46:40 03/18/07 (14)

doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - jeromelang 04:50:40 03/18/07 (13)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - David Aiken 01:42:36 03/19/07 (4)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - jeromelang 00:28:20 03/20/07 (3)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - David Aiken 23:17:52 03/20/07 (0)

"instead of getting the stock directly from their sister company, they are getting it from amazon"--R U sure? - Jazz Inmate 17:44:00 03/20/07 (0)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - Jack G 06:10:54 03/20/07 (0)

It strikes me as particularly encouraging - Jazz Inmate 15:37:31 03/18/07 (6)

Re: It strikes me as particularly encouraging - jeromelang 00:33:11 03/20/07 (1)

Re: It strikes me as particularly encouraging - Jazz Inmate 16:53:34 03/20/07 (0)

bd is different from sacd, there is no bw compatibility - jeromelang 18:23:15 03/18/07 (3)

I didn't quite understand the HD-DVD/DVD combo strategy... - oscar 11:25:48 03/19/07 (1)

Re: I didn't quite understand the HD-DVD/DVD combo strategy... - Jack G 06:24:20 03/20/07 (0)

I think you will see the same trend with upcoming titles simultaneously released on BD and DVD - Jazz Inmate 22:15:54 03/18/07 (0)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - Ole Lund Christensen 13:47:44 03/18/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange? - David Aiken 23:17:52 03/20/07 (0)

Re: doesn't that strike you as particularly strange?

Post a Message!