In Reply to: I don't care so much for how well the Pop-up menus work... posted by oscar on July 16, 2007 at 19:18:36:
The fact that one format has more gigabytes of storage space doesn't necessarily mean that the transfers are any different/better on one than the other or that the space available is even being effectively employed. I'd be interested in learning about variations and similarities in the formats that extend beyond the hypothetical of what looks good on spec. sheets.
I realize that as this competition heats up folks will start digging in their heels in support of one format over another, but like I've said before, I have no dog in this hunt. My concerns are squarely focused on 1) viewing my favorite films and concert footage in the highest resolution possible and 2) being able to purchase British, Asian and European fare without region code intrusion. So far HD-DVD has the best selection for my tastes, but that is always subject to change.
Finally, I'm sitting on the fence at present & will probably hold out until 3rd generation players arrive, but as prices keep dropping on HD players that may not be possible (temptation being what it is). In any event, I'd rather opt for a universal player to cover all possibilities. That would make my purchase as future proof as possible provided pricing isn't prohibitive and the performance is excellent on both formats.
Sorry about the digression, but back to my original question: Have you done any side by side comparisons of films released on both formats?
Cheers,
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Oscar, I'm just curious: have you done any side by side comparisons of films released on both formats? - Audiophilander 21:35:16 07/16/07 (1)
- Nope....I'd like to but I'm not buying one of each. - oscar 05:26:53 07/17/07 (0)