|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
|
|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
In Reply to: Actually, there's quite a bit of give and take on the AVS HD software discussion forum posted by oscar on August 17, 2007 at 10:27:45:
Noone has to defend it. BD has yet to prove the extra space gives a better picture.Paramount has different codecs for the different formats, yet the picture looks the same on both.
I beleive that the Prestige BD is 37G, but the import HD DVD is only 23G, and looks the same, according to folks who compared them. The BD mantra "more must be better" doesn't really hold water.
Check out posts 9 and 20 in the thread linked below.
enjoy,
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- ""30G is good enough" is not the mantra I'd want to try to defend. - Jack G 13:44:26 08/17/07 (6)
- Other folks have claimed to have seen the differences. - oscar 16:07:56 08/17/07 (5)
- "Unless, maybe you are dealing with 100+" screens... " - Jack G 06:09:17 08/18/07 (2)
- BD has it's share of clunkers. - oscar 06:31:06 08/18/07 (1)
- Sometimes soft is intentional - Jack G 09:05:20 08/18/07 (0)
- I've been more impressed with Disney's use of MPEG-4 than Warner's use of VC-1 - Jazz Inmate 20:53:45 08/17/07 (1)
- Are the differences a function of the encoding technnique or their implementers or different masters ? - oscar 06:07:15 08/18/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
