In Reply to: I'll have to disagree BOTH formats can thrive in competition with DVD. posted by oscar on September 1, 2007 at 09:35:51:
Economies of scale may never really kick in for BD well. The replicators are very expensive, and the cost is and may always be expensive. Conservative estimates show that BD-25s are about $0.90 more expenive to replicate than HD-30s, and BD-50s are about $4 more expensive. Even after working on BD-50s for years now, yeilds by Sony are still only about 40%. Face it, blu-ray is not now, and may never be able to practically replace DVD due to its difficulties.
OTOH, HD DVD is cheaper, faster and has yeilds approaching 95%. There's also already bout 300 replicators out there already that can make HD DVDs with little downtime-all DVD replcators made in the last few years are made to make DVDs or HD DVDs if desired.
I still believe that both can coexist as large scale niche produts. However, if you are into the "quickening", and feel there can be only one, HD DVD is n a far better position to fight DVD, than BD.
That of course, is just my $0.02. Take it for what its worth.
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "One has to prevail before mass market acceptance is possible and economies of scale can kick in to bring cost - Jack G 10:35:52 09/01/07 (8)
- Correction - Jack G 08:51:25 09/04/07 (6)
- Do you guys on AVS really believe that makes one iota of difference? NT - Jazz Inmate 10:47:05 09/04/07 (5)
- Paramount seems to (nt) - Jack G 10:55:41 09/04/07 (4)
- Warner, Fox, Disney and Sony don't seem to - Jazz Inmate 11:52:26 09/04/07 (3)
- Eventually the subsidies will stop - Jack G 12:06:25 09/04/07 (2)
- Yup, just as they did with SACD.* - jaiva 17:16:38 09/04/07 (1)
- And SACD on classical music is still "thriving". - oscar 17:22:47 09/04/07 (0)
- RE: "One has to prevail before mass market acceptance is possible and economies of scale can kick in to bring - Duilawyer 13:22:20 09/01/07 (0)