In Reply to: RE: Fine, but unimportant in the grand scheme of things posted by racerguy on September 5, 2007 at 12:09:07:
Your DD+ soundtrack might sound better (I seriously doubt it) based on any particular HT system because of how they massage the sound but it won't represent the original intent of the master audio tape. I'll lobby for the highest possible audio resolution be made available to me on HD media. So far, Blu-Ray has done a better job of delivering this than HD DVD has.
If HD DVD wants my business, they are going to have to start routinely releasing movies with lossless audio tracks AND "almost artifactless" video. I seriously doubt they can do it; though even Blu-ray would have trouble meeting the standard I'm asking for.
"Transformers" is another blockbuster release screaming for the best possible AQ/SQ. Unfortunately Paramount saw fit (and/or did not have choice) to release this without a lossless audio track. This development just further reinforces suspicions HD DVD cannot deliver topnotch video and lossless audio with the same movie because of storage limitations/bandwidth limitations.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A lossless PCM soundtrack will always be "truer to the source" than any lossy soundtrack. - oscar 20:36:36 09/05/07 (7)
- *sigh* - Jack G 05:20:31 09/06/07 (0)
- Sorry, but "always" is a sweeping generalization... - racerguy 21:19:35 09/05/07 (5)
- Alright, I failed to imply the possibility of different masters for - oscar 17:18:03 09/06/07 (0)
- PCM on a DVD? You're talking about Dolby Digital and that is a lossy algorithm - Jazz Inmate 10:08:30 09/06/07 (3)
- You should try reading what I actually wrote... - racerguy 10:17:08 09/06/07 (2)
- It didn't change since the first time I read it, and my reply stands - Jazz Inmate 12:52:13 09/06/07 (1)
- Whatever you thought you read seems to be different from what I wrote, as usual - racerguy 12:59:13 09/06/07 (0)