In Reply to: I'm sorry... posted by DavidLD on September 12, 2007 at 05:54:02:
If it's the immersion factor, obviously a 100" image beats a smaller size screen -- regardless of technology. If it's the 3D/life-like look, plasma is still the holder of that title -- again, regardless of technology.
If the cost for Panasonic's 103" plasma and their projector (with a 100" screen) were the same, I think we'd be looking at a unanimous decision when it came time to put money down. And I seriously doubt there'd be many going home with the 2-piece option.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- depends on what you're comparing - Joe Murphy Jr 18:04:03 09/12/07 (0)