In Reply to: It's the best hi def player out there for the $$$ posted by Jazz Inmate on October 4, 2007 at 12:23:15:
Just a personal bias I guess. I also didn't like the non-flat surface; I typically put discs/cases etc... on top of the player. Oh yeah, biggest hiccough: no 5.1 analog output. Other than that, I agree it was a dang good Blu-ray player.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm not a big fan of slot loaders. - oscar 12:59:41 10/04/07 (6)
- No Analog Outs Is The Biggest Drawback - Robertc88 13:12:27 10/04/07 (5)
- Naw, the lack of IR remote is bigger IMO [nt] - 4season 11:00:32 10/05/07 (0)
- at the moment, yeah. But when good HDMI preamps are released, that will be a nonissue - Jazz Inmate 14:43:41 10/04/07 (3)
- I don't know if ANY HDMI Pre/pro I'll be able to afford is going to be able to beat my current analog preamp - oscar 21:08:34 10/07/07 (0)
- Considering The Cost Of My First SACD Player - Robertc88 06:51:17 10/05/07 (1)
- Yes, it's a tremendous value and so are Blu-ray discs - Jazz Inmate 10:20:55 10/05/07 (0)