In Reply to: Solaris posted by wazoo on October 14, 2007 at 09:05:45:
...have compared the Russian version to a massive dose of Sominex. The endless tunnel sequence is one of the most boring sections of wasted film stock in history, subjectively speaking of course.>>> "In my opinion, it exemplifies what 'real' science fiction should be, while movies like 'Alien' are really just monster films that take place in space." <<<
Well, no offense, but I have to differ with your impressions even though I agree that good science fiction doesn't have to gravitate toward monster films to be relevent or involving. I consider AI-Artificial Intelligence, Charlie, The Abyss, Metropolis ('27), Clockwork Orange, etc., to be excellent science fiction films based upon thought provoking concepts, but AFAIC, Solaris (both versions, but especially "Tvarski's" original take on Stanislaw Lem's seminal work) is no more than an excuse for Directorial masturbation.
Respectfully,
AuPh
Edits: 10/26/07
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I have to agree with your wife; I've often called it Snorlaris, and both my wife & I ... - Audiophilander 16:35:09 10/26/07 (2)
- RE: I have to agree with your wife; I've often called it Snorlaris, and both my wife & I ... - Rod H. 20:11:50 10/28/07 (1)
- Good points, ... - Audiophilander 23:18:39 10/28/07 (0)