In Reply to: HELLO?!?! I own the Blu-ray, not the HD DVD posted by TK421 on December 20, 2007 at 15:08:36:
I thought you said you got the HD DVD, but going back, I see you got the Blu-ray and that, in fact, your set had the problem. Sorry.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yeah, I didn't realize that...I apologize - Jazz Inmate 16:03:22 12/20/07 (11)
- Apology accepted. Also, Warner Brothers has contacted me. - TK421 16:27:08 12/20/07 (10)
- Perhaps you should reconsider your acceptance - racerguy 19:26:40 12/21/07 (1)
- Why am I not surprised? - Jack G 06:24:38 12/22/07 (0)
- Bummer. Again, it seems the majority of them are ok, though - Jazz Inmate 17:12:43 12/20/07 (7)
- The number of respondents in an on-line video board poll isn't any indication either way. - Audiophilander 23:32:09 12/20/07 (6)
- So your point is that it's unwise to buy into online claims without supporting evidence - Jazz Inmate 10:38:49 12/21/07 (5)
- You're still off the point. An on-line poll of regulars on a given site isn't reflective... - Audiophilander 15:01:56 12/21/07 (4)
- Where would you go to poll blu-ray adopters about a recently-released BD? - Jazz Inmate 15:42:46 12/21/07 (3)
- "...you shouldn't be so quick to spread claims that you can't verify." - You should follow your own council. - Audiophilander 10:23:32 12/22/07 (2)
- Blu-ray's superior capacity is verifiable NT - Jazz Inmate 10:17:16 12/27/07 (1)
- "...verifiable" - Well, so is water on Mars, ... - Audiophilander 11:09:57 12/27/07 (0)