68.164.83.251
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: You're welcome posted by racerguy on September 22, 2007 at 15:07:21
>> That's right, genius. As I mentioned, it was in response to a post about bonus material. <<
No, it was part of a thread about--that's right--the fact that blu-ray's disc capacity provides significant advantages. In that case, the contents of a blu-ray had to be split across two HD DVDs. The issue of supplementary content was a peripheral point.
>> It's all about the context in which the statement was made. If you choose to deny that, you only make yourself look bad. <<
Yep, and in this case you badly misinterpreted the context and made yourself look bad.
>> Once again, you read something and fail to comprehend. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. That would be a complete waste of my time, as you have already demonstrated on multiple occasions. I'm merely pointing out your hypocrisy and inconsistency. <<
Well, thank goodness we have you hear to keep such close tabs on me. I'm sure the community and moderators are all very impressed with your fine work.
>> I don't expect you to see it, because I don't think you can. I'm just amusing myself at your expense. <<
Cute. For those of us here to discuss video formats, the fact remains, blu-ray has significantly greater capacity and therefore provides space for 5.1 LPCM where HD DVD does not.
>> >>either you care about that, or you don't. Those are the only two positions to take.<<
Perhaps that's true in your narrow little world. My horizons are somewhat broader than yours. <<
Your stupid insult aside, our respective views have nothing to do with this. Blu-ray provides several gigs more storage capacity than HD DVD. That's just a fact. You can be an insulting little twit all you like and the fact will not change.
>> Happy Autumnal Equinox, Jazz! <<
It's Yom Kippur.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Follow Ups: