70.249.18.25
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Perfect Vision might have been close to correct a year ago.... posted by oscar on September 23, 2007 at 21:11:35
...it isn't ALL about picture and/or sound quality, IMO. It's also about what is available and the intellectual or entertainment value of the content reproduced. Certainly sound & picture quality are important, but dependent upon the rarity/desirability of the material in question it shouldn't negatively impact the appreciation and enjoyment of the content.
Of course one always wants the BEST duplication available, especially where current movies are concerned, but it isn't always possible to achieve higher resolution with older collectible TV programs, films and concert footage especially when the original negatives may not exist anymore or videotape broadcasting was in it's infancy. Now if new movies are ALL that the enthusiast finds interesting then I suppose you have a point, but limiting ones viewing based solely upon picture quality sounds a little like buying books by the pound because they place greater value on a book's page count than it's content.
AuPh
Follow Ups: