In Reply to: Display Quality, What Am I Missing? posted by Vic D on March 29, 2008 at 08:21:56:
As a relatively recent (and happy) owner of a new Pioneer Kuro 5010FD plasma display, I can tell you that I also did much comparison shopping, and have come away from the experience knowing that you simply cannot make any serious judgments of picture quality while looking at display models in a store. Even if the salesman re-sets a display's settings back to 'standard' mode, there's still a fair amount of processing going on underneath--processing that should be further tweaked for optimum results. I chose this particular Kuro model because I wanted great blacks and a more film-like look to the picture, which is where I believe plasmas are superior to LCDs. (I bought it online, BTW, and saved a bundle.)
I can tell you that the picture I'm seeing on my Pioneer is WAY better than what I saw on ANY store display, LCD or plasma. I attribute that to all the adjustments I made to the display's settings--in 'standard' mode, mind you--that made the picture look more natural and film-like. These adjustments included turning OFF many picture-processing (and degrading) 'features' like velocity scan modulation and lowering the sharpness and contrast settings. I started with the suggested settings published by someone on the AVS Forum and have been very pleased with the results. (To get really optimum results, I really should get the set ISF-calibrated, but that is a major expense and I already feel like I'm 95% of the way there, so it's not a priority at the moment.) Now I cringe every time I walk into a BB/Magnolia or similar store and look at their displays--they all look so artificially pumped-up and overly etched, even though the salesmen claim they are all set to 'standard' mode.
Russell
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Display Quality, What Am I Missing? - Russell 17:39:00 03/29/08 (0)