In Reply to: "The proper term should be 'climate intensification'." Well ya learn something new... posted by clarkjohnsen on May 1, 2008 at 08:09:52:
so you can tell us all how things are just fine up there in the arctic!
Enough silliness. I agree with you the media overstates and sensationalizes everything, and it is nauseating. However, 'Scientific American' is not what I would call an alarmist or sensationalizing publication, and as a long time subscriber I can tell you that in this very area they are concerned that good science is being swept aside for profits by greedy old men who don't care about anything than their own immediate gratification, regardless of the consequences to others or the world around them. (Unless, of course, you think you're smarter than the internationally recognized climatological experts and editorial board of THAT publication, too!)
Why don't we talk about video and try to 'help' one another, hmmm? Let's leave the 'politics of science' to another forum....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hopefully, you'll be reincarnated as a polar bear... - Winston Smith 23:17:26 05/02/08 (1)
- "Good science is being swept aside for profits by greedy old men." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:01:12 05/03/08 (0)