got matrix trilogy boxset in BD and they are awesome - the difference in picture quality (when compared to regular DVDs, all of which I also own) is amazing, especially the close-up scenes of the people - i could really count their eyebrow...
so i bought some more BDs but they are not so impressive. like right now, i'm watching Tomb raider in BD and while it's running at full HD (1920*1024 at24HZ), their picture quality seems to be only marginally better when compared to regular DVDs...
anyone noticed the same? does it have something to do with how the original movies were filmed? maybe recent ones and the ones being filmed have the eventual BD release in mind?
btw, the TV is full-hd capable samsung 46" with all the bells and whisles and the player is PS3.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - not all BDs are the same? - tvnoob 21:16:35 01/15/09 (7)
- that's right just like DVD's - jimmyjames 13:05:56 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: not all BDs are the same? - Cosmic Closet 12:13:11 01/17/09 (1)
- RE: not all BDs are the same? - Jack G 17:15:27 01/17/09 (0)
- RE: not all BDs are the same? - ftran999 18:25:44 01/16/09 (0)
- What Joe says… - David Aiken 23:50:07 01/15/09 (0)
- numerous factors - Joe Murphy Jr 22:45:47 01/15/09 (1)
- and another thing - Joe Murphy Jr 15:23:05 01/17/09 (0)