In Reply to: Netflix jacks the price for Blu-ray rental posted by racerguy on March 30, 2009 at 13:49:52:
The note I got said, that, since Blu-ray discs cost more, they have to charge more. My impression is that the costs of todays' Blu-ray discs really aren't that much more than standard DVDs did just a few years ago. Some standard DVDs have always cost a lot more (e.g., the Criterion Collection), but they never charged more for renting those to what I expect is a smaller demand; oops, maybe I shouldn't give them ideas. What price Netflix pays for Blu-ray discs is another question, but it must be a lot less than you or I would pay. Or course, I have no idea of their complete business model and how much the cost of discs plays into their profits. Most Blu-ray discs that they are buying are relatively popular titles and should attract rentals. Having all Blu-ray titles available could be attractive for people considering buying a player who would then join Netflix if the price is right.
So my question: is the cost of the discs likely to be a cost-driver for them or an excuse for raising charges for people they expect will likely be willing to pay? Probably we can only guess.
Joe
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Care to comment on their "justification?" - jsm 10:40:11 04/08/09 (0)