In Reply to: Thinking of getting a Plasma TV posted by Ross on October 3, 2009 at 13:19:26:
120Hz refresh is an LCD thing to help reduce motion artifacts, not needed for plasmas (least for that reason).
I have noticed, in a pitch dark room, that I could see a vague ghost of a 4:3 frame from when I watched 100 hours (or something ridiculous) of TV DVDs all in a row (over weeks I mean, no 16:9 images in between). This would be consdered plasma abuse by the plasma cops, but it does happen. This went away very quickly BTW, it is not really burn-in like Kal was alluding to. It is recommended to stretch 4:3 to fill the whole screen to prevent this, but I can't stand the distorted AR. Also recommended to intersperse 16:9 viewing with 4:3 viewing if you must have proper AR.
Pioneer, and I presume others, have a thing that "jiggles" the image slightly. You can't really see it and it helps prevent true burn-in. The current phosphors are pretty long-lived, and they are also much naturally brighter than way back, so they don't have to be driven as hard to give decent brightness (also reduces the prospect of burn-in).
For the size you're looking at, Panasonic and Samsung make the best plasmas now. Personally I'd choose Panny, but I know a lot of calibrators like Samsung so there's no doubt they can be tuned up well.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thinking of getting a Plasma TV - cfraser 15:20:01 10/03/09 (0)