In Reply to: 42" 1080p or 50" 720p? That is the question. posted by RFitzgerald on December 17, 2009 at 09:18:09:
Thanks for your replies.
Mr. Hertz, for a second I thought I had the 720p-1080p in reverse, too, but nah, I had it right. The reason for my comparison is the price of the 2 different tvs is the same. A 720p 42" is about $200 less than the 1080p version and the 720p 50".
I will continue looking for something that doesn't exist and I have high hopes for finding IT.
I've found comparing pic quality at stores to be almost impossible. Whoever sets up TVs for display needs a new pair of spectacles. All the LCDs look like they were coated with oil paints and the plasmas look like they were sprayed with black. I do not blame the manuf. for such lousy pics but the manager of Sears' A/V dept. - Juan Ramirez Escobar.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 42" 1080p or 50" 720p? That is the question. - RFitzgerald 08:46:44 12/18/09 (3)
- The thought I was trying to convey was... - The Real Dick Hertz 12:13:07 12/18/09 (1)
- RE: The thought I was trying to convey was... - cfraser 13:29:34 12/18/09 (0)
- the blame game - Joe Murphy Jr 11:20:47 12/18/09 (0)