...by the mass consumer audience? Reminds me of quad sound of the late 70's and early 80's. Lots of consumers who have just purchased new 2D televisions due to the drop in prices, won't trade them for a more expensive 3D display. Very little content available. And speaking for myself, I'm not wearing those stupid glasses.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Is 3D television ahead of it's time? Or will it be accepted at all... - Mr. Dick Hertz 12:26:21 01/11/11 (18)
- When they can make it work without the 3D glasses, I might be interested.... - oscar 19:22:41 01/29/11 (0)
- It will probably be accepted in the cinema, especially for animated and SF films, but doubtful for HT. - Audiophilander 00:11:52 01/25/11 (1)
- RE: Why 3D doesn't work and never will, Case closed - JohanV 09:46:35 01/27/11 (0)
- yes ... and it always has been - petew 16:07:55 01/12/11 (3)
- I've seen the glaring TV name. - grantv 08:16:22 01/13/11 (2)
- That is why they invented black duct tape nt - DavidLD 10:50:55 01/24/11 (1)
- That is why other manufacturers make TV's. :) - grantv 10:56:16 01/24/11 (0)
- RE: Is 3D television ahead of it's time? Or will it be accepted at all... - JimL 12:51:24 01/12/11 (0)
- don't care for it -- big or little screen - Joe Murphy Jr 14:26:40 01/11/11 (6)
- RE: don't care for it -- big or little screen - sbrians 13:18:21 01/14/11 (0)
- good diatribe - mbnx01 12:49:45 01/13/11 (4)
- get sick on the cheap - Joe Murphy Jr 17:21:59 01/13/11 (3)
- RE: get sick on the cheap - Jack G 08:12:59 01/15/11 (2)
- A fad? - grantv 14:11:15 01/11/11 (2)
- Follow-up; saw Tron in 3D last night.... - grantv 09:47:42 01/12/11 (1)
- RE: Follow-up; saw Tron in 3D last night.... - mbnx01 12:48:19 01/13/11 (0)