In Reply to: Less detail with 3D? posted by Ned on December 23, 2010 at 20:05:38:
The 3D may not have been full resolution 3D (1920 x 1080 for each eye). If it was side by side or top and bottom 3D you would have seen 960 x 1080 or 1920 x 540 respectively at each eye.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Less detail with 3D? - mdavis 21:26:13 04/03/11 (0)