In Reply to: The second sentence says it all-- the vacillation of all time. And this is one critic. The contention was that posted by tinear on August 20, 2014 at 21:07:03:
"ALL critics or at least a consensus saw the Kuro as being beaten. I showed that wasn't so." Really? Where? All you "showed" was a three year old article that did not even have a last gen Panasonic to compare to a Kuro not to mention that the author was talking about 2011 TVs. Two years later the very same author review the last gen Panasonics and stated that they both outperformed the Kuros:
"Let me get this out of the way first: Panasonic's TC-PZT60 is now the best-performing TV we've ever reviewed."
"The TC-PVT60 also beat our in-house Kuro"
"I've read plenty of reviews saying Kuro has never been equalled--- and never will..." Could you link some of those, I would like to read them.
"Also, note the Panasonic isn't manufactured anymore, making buying a new one as difficult as a new Kuro." Common sense says that finding a new display that was discontinued only 8 months ago is far easier and more likely than one discontinued years ago.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The second sentence says it all-- the vacillation of all time. And this is one critic. The contention was that - mrdavis842 13:33:48 08/21/14 (1)
- Please, go back, read the second sentence. - tinear 14:01:16 08/21/14 (0)