Video Asylum

You're missing a critical point: it isn't just picture quality & format capacity, it's also about content!

68.91.33.148

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

In Reply to: RE: Agreed. A waste. posted by Kal Rubinson on August 10, 2008 at 09:56:42

Sorry Kal, but you and I apparently have widely differing perspectives on this.

For some folks seeing musicians in their prime performing when they were at their creative peak is more important than seeing all the wrinkles, elaborate sets and colored lights, while the once great performers, now on their last legs or virtual walkers, go through the motions. I, for one, could care less about seeing the current Rolling Stones, but I would pay handsomely for an Official Blu-ray release of Ladies and Gentlemen, ...The Rolling Stones, the WS '72 tour film originally released in quad & WS!

As we all get older sometimes nostalgia is preferable to those unpleasant reminders that we're not kids anymore. IOW, watching older folks rock out isn't as enjoyable as watching folks our own age do it especially if the footage takes us back. Sometimes older performances, warts and all, have far more visual and aural appeal than all the whiz-bang photography tricks and tweaked-out 5.1, 7.1, or 20.1 surround effects.

Does this mean that folks shouldn't have an interest in seeing older footage presented in an HD format simply because it wasn't originally filmed in high-definition or widescreen? I certainly don't think so, as long as some improvement can be derived over standard DVD. Of course, YMMV.

AuPh

Follow Ups: