76.115.217.131
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: An interesting experiemnt... posted by rlw on March 08, 2015 at 06:38:54
Good point.
I don't put a lot of stock into much of what they say. But at least they know enough to speak the truth once or twice every 10 years. But at least they know enough of the truth to speak something worthwhile once every while as apposed to those other so-called experts who can't even speak it once.
It would be great to have a fully functional clock. But even a broken clock is right at least twice a day. As opposed to a clock in pieces with no hands on the dial. Right?
An easier test actually for something to look for would be well-recorded piano piece that includes a lot of sharp notes high on the register and played back at volume levels approaching the live performance.
They say piano is the most difficult instrument to accurately reproduce. There's are lot of truth in that statement. But I think a more accurate way of saying it is, "All instruments are near equal in difficulty to reproduce. But the piano may be the most easily discerned to illustrate how far short of the mark our playback systems really are.
The sharp piano notes at reasonably high volumes should make a bee-line to your ear much like a laser beam causing fatique, whincing, or "bleeding of the ear".
BTW, any music is tolerable to the ear at elevator music volumne levels.
Follow Ups:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2015, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Take5 ]