Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Re: internal projector scaler vs external/quadscan

208.33.242.2

In order of 3:2 (progressive de-interlacing) performance

Poor- Mitsu internal
Better - Quadscan (genesis)
Best- DVDo Pro with Sil503

Scaling performance
None- DVDO does not scale, only de-interlaces
BEtter- Mitsu internally takes 480p up to XGA
Best- Quadscan


In order of quality
Poor- mitsubishi with no external device
Better - Mitsu with DVDO de-interlacing to 480p
Best- Quadscan scaling to XGA.

You will note that your DVDO probably has better de-interlacing than the Quadscan alone, due to using a better chipset (s503 vs Genesis)

However, the DVDO does not perform SCALING at all, while the Quadscan does (in your case you would scale to XGA).

It is because of the scaling feature that I would recommend the Quadscan over the DVDO.

Does this help?
dg


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Re: internal projector scaler vs external/quadscan - Dan G. 13:52:14 05/09/01 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.