|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.140.44.203
In Reply to: Thought III was better than I or II -- Me Too posted by Mr Underhill on May 18, 2007 at 12:43:40
>>> "Equally there are enough weaknesses in this film that I would normally be happily be pulling it to pieces, but the film's positive elements meant that I could skate over them rather than dwelling on them." <<<
No offense, but I couldn't skate over the glaring faults as did you and Jon.
>>> "I thoroughly enjoyed it, two hours of mindless entertainment - well, what do you expect of a comic!" <<<
I've been a fan of the Spidey comics since the earliest days. There's mindless and then there's brain-dead; the third film has FAR too many precious coincidences to be entertaining for anyone who cares about logic in a film or even a broadly drawn comic book. Sadly, the problems with Raimi's third effort boils down to sloppy screen writing and complacent direction.
I realize that you don't especially care for the social relevance stuff ("insight into the human condition"), but it's what contributed to the first two films success at suspending disbelief and I would assume the resultant popularity of those films. Note: Suspension of disbelief is essential to the appreciation of character driven cinema, and the Spiderman series is unequivocally character-driven even if not "high art" cinema.
Cheers,
AuPh
AuPh,
Yep - I was reading the Spidey comics in the early 70s.
As I point out to my girls Spiderman, Buffy et al are build on the premise that someone through some twist of fate becomes a superhero - we can all dream, but I can't get too strung up about it.
I can fully understand anyone shredding this film - but to be honest I could pull the other films to pieces too.
Martin
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: