 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.212.243.216
In Reply to: RE: WTF!... posted by jamesgarvin on August 22, 2007 at 10:23:04
Question 1.
What is your analysis of the original question? Please be thorough; I expect several paragraphs. Please refrain from any reference to my earlier comments. You should strive to be original in thought and expression. Demonstrate the depth of your knowledge concerning the talent, careers and reputation of the lead players mentioned, including the director, and how that comes to bear on the relative (lack of) success of the movie at the boxoffice.
Further, will "Breach", an ADMITTED CRITICAL SUCCESS, have staying power in the pantheon of like films. Why? Use "The Spy Who Came In From The Cold" as a benchmark comparison in your discussion.
Question 2.
Why didn't you respond to the original question in the beginning, instead of picking my comments - out of context - to snipe at? What does this say about your general approach to participation in this forum. Are you interested in construction or destruction? Objective or personal?
Question 3.
Why can't you discern the multitude of questions - direct and implied - I've repeatedly directed toward you in this silly spat.
Question 4.
Which are you, stupid, afraid or inattentive? I know, that's a wiseass remark. I really don't care.
Question 5.
Do you want to kiss and make up? I'm tired of dealing with this silliness. If "no" then go to next question.
Question 6.
In future, will you please just ignore me and my comments? I'm hoping for a simple "yes" to this question.
Follow Ups:
"What is your analysis of the original question?"
I write, at length, that your posts did not contain any questions, with the exception of "what conclusions", for which I responded to your question by pasting the conclusions you asked me about, and then you, again, summarily write about "questions", all without writing the question you are referring to.
"Why didn't you respond to the original question in the beginning, instead of picking my comments - out of context - to snipe at?"
I specifically asked you to write the question, because, as I pointed out, you never did ask me (or anyone else) any questions.
"Why can't you discern the multitude of questions - direct and implied - I've repeatedly directed toward you in this silly spat."
Multitude? Should be easy to point them out. Try. "Implied?" You mean, you "implied" questions? You call me stupid?
"Which are you, stupid, afraid or inattentive? I know, that's a wiseass remark. I really don't care."
Let me try to join your educational and intellectual level. Ahem, um, "My daddy can beat up your daddy." Or. "Let's meet at the bicycle rack after school."
"In future, will you please just ignore me and my comments? I'm hoping for a simple "yes" to this question."
Um. no. Please re-read the posts. You go on the attack and then whine? Man, you are daft.
Pretty weak, James.
You have yet to address tinear's original question. Which I have continually pointed out and rephrased for your benefit.
I'm still waiting for your answer to my #1 (parts one and two), #4 and #5.
One thing I can compliment you on is an impressive ability for evasion.
Oh, well. "Sigh...." and so on. And your mama wears combat boots. LOL.
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
