|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
216.196.176.121
In Reply to: RE: James... posted by afilado on August 22, 2007 at 11:26:10
"What is your analysis of the original question?"
I write, at length, that your posts did not contain any questions, with the exception of "what conclusions", for which I responded to your question by pasting the conclusions you asked me about, and then you, again, summarily write about "questions", all without writing the question you are referring to.
"Why didn't you respond to the original question in the beginning, instead of picking my comments - out of context - to snipe at?"
I specifically asked you to write the question, because, as I pointed out, you never did ask me (or anyone else) any questions.
"Why can't you discern the multitude of questions - direct and implied - I've repeatedly directed toward you in this silly spat."
Multitude? Should be easy to point them out. Try. "Implied?" You mean, you "implied" questions? You call me stupid?
"Which are you, stupid, afraid or inattentive? I know, that's a wiseass remark. I really don't care."
Let me try to join your educational and intellectual level. Ahem, um, "My daddy can beat up your daddy." Or. "Let's meet at the bicycle rack after school."
"In future, will you please just ignore me and my comments? I'm hoping for a simple "yes" to this question."
Um. no. Please re-read the posts. You go on the attack and then whine? Man, you are daft.
Follow Ups:
Pretty weak, James.
You have yet to address tinear's original question. Which I have continually pointed out and rephrased for your benefit.
I'm still waiting for your answer to my #1 (parts one and two), #4 and #5.
One thing I can compliment you on is an impressive ability for evasion.
Oh, well. "Sigh...." and so on. And your mama wears combat boots. LOL.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: