|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
86.2.168.92
In Reply to: RE: Depends what you mean..... posted by patrickU on November 27, 2007 at 11:10:06
Point is that I have known men who are gay, men who are effeminate and straight, guys and women who have lived together but are not sexually active. The film had lots of sub-text, but nothing was - to me - actively spelt out.
In terms of his motivations I see venal behavior around me, whether this is in peoples willingness to trample on their colleagues to get up the greasy pole, or their grasping after things at the expense of relationships, their children and broader society, or indeed their willingness to support criminals in order to boost their own careers!
Recognising that such things exist does not mean that I have to approve of them. My battle is to try not to allow it to twist me - but I still despise it. Fortunately I know many people who have got their priorities properly ordered - at least to my way of thinking!
I found Capote's behavior, as portrayed, disturbing. My sympathies were with the townsfolk he befriended. I had no empathy for Capote as his breakdown was what, in my opinion, he richly deserved; but I did not enjoy the journey as portrayed in the film.
Innocent? I wish, but I am battling to get there.
Follow Ups:
Bonjour,
It was not actively spelt out because it is, first in the public domain, second, because you could not read...between the line..
TC is like the rest of us, a mix of calcul and generosity.
The balance may tend to one side more that to the other...
But to get where you want to get you have to know the rule of the game, if you are active in this society, but you can live in a better place in you own...maybe..
Capote was egocentric, but show me one artist who is not..
PS: This film has been discussed here, you can make a search..
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: