Films/DVD Asylum

• Okay, that's more like it, and I'll make an extra effort to give you the benefit of doubt. - Audiophilander 01:05:13 04/09/08 (0)
  In Reply to: RE: Sigh.....you really are annoying.....well you certainly have enough time on your hands to post.... posted by TWB on April 08, 2008 at 22:23:20

  > > > "well you certainly have enough time on your hands to post....endless drivel here...." < < <

  Not really, I type fast and respond mostly at night when I'm not painting (insomniac that I am). As far as 'drivel' ...well, that's a matter of opinion. 1) Your's, which reminds me of a grenade pin thrown into discussions before the grenadier realizes what he's actually done, and 2) mine, which endeavors to enlighten through a measured responses, balancing information, humor and occasional sarcasm.

  > > > "(quote) - 1.'Who knows, maybe your background qualifies you to dance in a Broadway musical, but so far the tap-dancing isn't impressing me' (unquote) - uh...yeah at one time I could have.... but not any more....and believe me when I say that Auph....I've NEVER tried to impress YOU!!!!!" < < <

  That was sarcasm, not intended to be taken too seriously, but the point was that whether you're a stage actor or pole dancer it doesn't provide you with professional credentials to disrespect someone's empirical film criticisms as if you are more knowledgeable in that medium.

  BTW, I'm glad you NEVER try to impress me; that would be of greater than your misguided opinions. 8^D

  > > > "2. I said the films won awards....I still maintain that it was a weak year and the awards reflected the body of the work and NOT that particular film....which IMO WAS ridiculously long....I won't even comment on the longer version.....I'm an avid filmgoer and it takes alot to put me to sleep....I nodded off TWICE when I saw the last film at the theater....." < < <

  We'll have to agree to disagree on your assertion that Return of the King won 11 Academy Awards just because it was a 'weak' year, that the film was too long and that a true film lover would go to sleep on it unless they were suffering from some form of sleep deprivation, but I would recommend taking legal stimulants or drinking a pot of coffee before watching these epic fantasy films if it's that difficult for you to stay awake.

  > > > '3. "condescending inference"...."Sorry you're SO sensitive!!!.....my remark was not the least bit condescending....' < < <

  Well, it may have been an overreaction on my part given the tenet of some of your prior comments on the Outside board and the meat-puppet post you inserted in this thread in response to mr. grits. I'm not sensitive at all (if you don't know that by now, then there's little hope for you), but when my BS meter goes off in reaction to misguided criticism it's usually dead-on.

  > > > "4. On the subject of epics.....I actually LOVE all of the films that you mentioned (including GWTW)....they are all in my library and I watch them from time to time...Lean and Ford (who directed part of HTWWW) have both directed some of my absolute favorite films....Lawrence Of Arabia and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance being two of those....." < < <

  I've seen all of those (including GWTW, which now comes across as horribly dated soap-opera fluff containing an embarrassment of racially whitewashed themes and very uneven performances). My film collection consists of around 2000 plus films, with many epics including the extended versions of the LoTR trilogy. Personally, I prefer Ford's late silent work even though HTWWW is a superb Cinerama epic as is Kubrick's 2001 (I was fortunate to see both of them in Cinerama back in the 60's), but David Lean was one of the best epic filmmakers, IMHO.

  > > > "5. Jackson IMO has a great visual sense but lacks the ability to tell a concise story....he needs to stay out of the editing room and leave it to the professionals he hires ( I read somewhere that he is VERY involved in the process)...LOA has some wonderful examples of inspired editing and cutting....." < < <

  Again, we'll just have to agree to disagree, because the Tolkien trilogy was virtually perfect as filmed and edited, IMIO.

  > > > (6.) "dark" can be a very good thing....YOU did not think that the LOTR's films were somewhat "dark"? .....if NOT we must have seen different films.....a director like Burton has made a career out of honing his skill with "dark" films......with Sweeney Todd being his darkest yet....of course the subject matter helped make the case.....' < < <

  Dark fantasy should be filmed as dark fantasy, but while LoTR is shadowy and intense it rarely falls into the dark category by my definition of it. The Hobbit should be even less dark than Tolkien's LoTR trilogy.

  Regards,
  AuPh
  
  

  ---

  Edits: 04/09/08

Post a Followup:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---