Films/DVD Asylum

Since there's no longer any Ebert in it...

68.30.206.102

Harmonia

In Reply to: RE: Ebert and Roeper At The Movies... posted by mkuller on July 22, 2008 at 10:44:09

...there's no reason at all to watch it, if there ever was. I have no interest in Roeper's opinions whatsoever.

It was viable as Siskel and Ebert, but the show never really recovered from losing Siskel.

No more from the balcony.

Follow Ups:

RE: Since there's no longer any Ebert in it... - Albert B. Broman 19:15:09 07/22/08 (1)
At the website Roger has a farewell statement and I think it poignant that the statement is headed by a picture of himself with Gene Siskel. In a way I don't think Roger ever recovered from the death of Gene.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080721/FEATURED/150028057
- I'm not sure I agree... - mkuller 15:10:59 07/24/08 (0)
  > In a way I don't think Roger ever recovered from the death of Gene.>
  
  I thought he had a lot of fun interviewing replacements by letting them try to fill Gene's seat.
  
  After Roeper started I emailed him about what I thought was a poor choice. He sent me back a nice response asking me to give Roeper time.
  
  I don't think the show ever recovered from Gene's death.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable