Films/DVD Asylum

You and Max keep muttering generalities. Tarantino and Malick have NO such

71.34.243.241

tinear

In Reply to: RE: Star power can make or break the financing.....you go with the safe bet--if requested. * posted by mr grits on January 04, 2009 at 20:45:44

problems.
Both Tarantino and Malick have produced films which have done very well (for "art" films) without big stars. You think Tarantino would risk wrecking the film of his career (his description) by having a mediocre lead? Or that Malick, in one of his very infrequent films would?
Fact is Pitt has earned his emerging reputation as a serious actor in several roles, one of which is in current release.
If either of you can show any previous cynical casting by either director, go ahead.

Follow Ups:

Malick tanked on his last one: New World * - mr grits 11:32:43 01/05/09 (1)
.
- RE: Malick tanked on his last one: New World * - The Duke 10:10:48 01/06/09 (0)
  What was wrong with "The New World"? I thought it was quite good. His weakest (but still acceptable) was "The Thin Red Line".

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion