|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.34.243.175
On my second visit, I liked it even more than my first enthusiastic experience.
In a small, dark (this is a Bela Tarr film, after all), rainy town whose only business appears to be mining, a man is consumed with the wife of another; she seems to see him as nothing but a diversion whilst her husband is away.
The lover asks her to escape the town, her marriage, and her daughter and he plans some sort of illegal activity to finance it.
Tarr, whose style is quite different from Tarkovsky's but almost as inscrutable, is not a plot driven director; yet, one becomes inexplicably involved in the fate of the characters. Unlike, say, the characters in "Watchmen," these are people with feet of clay; still, the bleakness, the sense of doom and melancholy is inescapable and far more harrowing.
And Tarr's is a subtle intelligence: a long shot in a bar, with camera movement somehow coordinated between focusing and panning, gradually reveals surprise after surprise, injecting understanding and motive into the characters action and non-action.
If Dostoevsky had made films, this is what they would have looked like.
A brilliant masterpiece by one of the true geniuses in modern film.
Follow Ups:
I'd been being bludgeoned between my eyes.. no hope nothing but endless,increasing despair.. if this was his aim he's a great success,lol.
of "Singin' in the Rain."
Kidding.
Actually, I found the deception fascinating: all the characters were duping one another.
But.... with that title, you weren't expecting slapstick, were you?
Seriously, I enjoyed it far more the second time. That's been the case with all the Tarr films, for me.
:-)
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: