Audio Asylum Thread Printer

Get a view of an entire thread on one page

FAQ / News / Events

Films/DVD Asylum

"35mm better than digital" not recently

118.243.90.224

In Reply to: RE: "I can hardly believe were somehow caught on the 1939 original film" posted by tunenut on September 29, 2009 at 13:01:32

I've attended a couple of photo exhibitions recently where digital cameras were used + I've developed the conclusion that digital camera definition has become so good that only medium format (film) cameras have an edge over digital; and maybe not for much longer
As for digital transfers from film to hard drive, there are so many software tools available for sound + vision that almost anything can be done post-production
Blu Ray looks like it is fulfilling its promise as a DVD replacement format
GW

Edits: 10/05/09

Follow Ups:

I can believe what you say however - tunenut 11:33:18 10/05/09 (0)
I'm sure that the resolution of the digital cameras used in the photos in an exhibition are higher than the blu-ray resolution. That is why I restricted by statement to the blu-ray format. And in terms of post-production, that's all well and good, but it doesn't restore resolution.
RE: "35mm better than digital" not recently - Wendell Narrod 08:41:07 10/05/09 (0)
BluRay is excellent but, to my eyes, it still doesn't compare to a quality 35mm print when it comes to the theater experience. Digital still photography has made amazing advances.

-Wendell

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: