Films/DVD Asylum

2001 fails in showing a realistic depiction of space? Strong disagreement!

97.125.113.116

tinear

In Reply to: RE: It is a philosophical thing posted by Victor Khomenko on January 27, 2010 at 17:28:24

The spaceships, their flight over the planet surface, the landing.... all look amazingly real, even today. You know why, I assume? NO FX. All models and then older-fashioned analog manipulation. I'd argue that the effects in "Forbidden Planet" similarly surpass any CGI bullshit.
One of the best parts of 2001 is its portrayal of Russians. I bet that's what bothers you!

Follow Ups:

RE: 2001 fails in showing a realistic depiction of space? Strong disagreement! - Victor Khomenko 09:17:02 01/28/10 (0)
***The spaceships, their flight over the planet surface, the landing.... all look amazingly real, even today.

Really? Realistic? Have you seen objects fly by at space velocities?

Forget that... have you seen a pistol bullet fly?

There was nothing realistic about the film.
RE: 2001 Was merde. - patrickU 08:43:11 01/28/10 (0)
Back then I remember I was the only one of all my friends who did not like it.
Save the first five minutes of magic, the rest was empty as empty can be.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio