|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.169.153.94
In Reply to: RE: Okay, here ya' go.... posted by jamesgarvin on September 17, 2010 at 08:01:43
..I'd never hire you for your lawyerly skills if this is an example of "proof", as you see it.
Question: Which is more "realistic" A Civil Action or At Close Range?
I understand and agree with your priorities with regard to family. Your boys are at a wonderful age.
Congratulations.
Also like your taste in amps. Which Music Reference model do you have? If it's the RM10 you can be my new best friend.
J
Follow Ups:
This is what you asked me: '"...objective provable fact" in a film, prove it.' It is a provable fact that the opening scene in A Civil Action was contrived. Made up. Whatever you want to call it, it simply does not happen as depicted in the film. That is simply a fact, whether you care to admit it or not. I've proven it. I cannot force you to accept the proof, anymore than I can prove to some people the Government did not blow up the twin towers.
RM-200. I'll get the RM10 when I have room for a second system.
.. you mean "in my experience" then you have..........your argument. You've taken your experience and compared it to a fictional account. That's no broad proof.
Don't you stray. Don't forget how this started. We're talking about film realism. Repeat: which is more realistic (like real life), A Civil Action or At Close Range.
I'll bet there are people who saw Travolta's scene and imagined it to be quite realistic.
The fact is that proof is always relative/contextual. First of all it is personal. That takes us back to our beginning. One man's ......... is another man's ___.
BTW, why would you consider it unfortunate to be in the courtroom practicing law? In my short career as a military defense counsel I relished courtroom action.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: