|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.37.171.52
In Reply to: RE: Agreed as to BHD, but as for SPR... posted by semuta on October 06, 2010 at 13:52:06
Damon played a very small part, and the other battle scenes (French town, charging the hilltop bunker and guarding the bridge) were enough to push it into elite category for me. I'm even more critical of Hanks than I am of Damon, but the rest of the supporting cast was very good. And that subplot of taking mercy on the nazi captured during the charge only to have him come back and drive a knife slowly into the heart of private Mellish was for me the key message of the film. If that had been the focal point instead of Hank's words to Damon that his life needed to be worth the sacrifice, it would have been a much better movie. And that way, you wouldn't have the old Ryan at the cemetary to bookend the entire film.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Follow Ups:
and that Matt Damon's acting is hardly a deal breaker. My problem with the movie has to do with Spielberg having to give it a big ole Hollywood type ending. The movie asks a very interesting question: How important is the life of one person in the conflict; was it worth a mission that would claim many other lives? The big ending battle, which results in an important military victory (hold a very strategic bridge), completely abandons any consideration of that question; I guess we dumb viewers just have to have that big cavalry charge (P 51 mustangs) and American heroes doing big things!!
The camera work, setup of battle scenes, use of sound, etc. were fantastic. That silence at the end, where Hanks goes temporarily deaf, reminded me of the GREAT Russian war film "idi i smotri" (Come and See).
The silence after the explosion bit is done to death. It was done better in BHD. It was also done well in Clear and Present Danger when Harrison Ford's convoy was attacked by rooftop hostiles with RPGs.
I disagree strongly about whether it's worth lives to save a life being an interesting thrust. There's nothing to explore in the question because any soldier could die in any moment in war. Spielberg really missed the boat. Our soldiers have a commitment to leave no man behind--that's what BHD was about. The idea that soldiers would be disgruntled to go save the last remaining child of a mother who had sacrificed all her other boys to the war...that just didn't ring true to me.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: